MI3 Sucked Balls
After watching MI3 a few days ago, I was very disapointed with the overall quality of the film. First the plot. Yes action movies for the most part lack one, but good movies (i.e. Bad Boys II) have a decent story line to follow, with constant humour and action inbetween. M13 lacked this quality, and was to heavily focused on Tom Cruise who I am (not) sorry to say looks like a child molester. The main villian in this movie (played byPhilip Seymour Hoffman) lacked airtime to develop his character which made him appear like a cliched villain; one bent on the goals of all supervillains, the accumuation of money.
What this movie did have, were few good action scenes and a very compelling intro scene. This movie needed more suspence and less of Tom crying over some dumb bitch, who happens to instantly learn how to use a gun like a Navy Seal. I give this movie a 6 out of 10.
Scientology and action films don't mix! Afterall look what it did to Oprah...
posted by Tristan | 5/11/2006 11:10:00 AM
|
1 comments
1 Comments:
-
Brock Campbell
Havn't seen MI3 yet but I've been gettin mixed reactions. However, you say that Bad Boys 2 was good? Come on, if you are saying MI3 is bad because it didn't live up to Bad Boys 2's standards then I might just have to take a take at this movie.
5/12/2006 08:09:00 PMOn the other note, I feel that Tom Cruise has taken a real battering for simply the fact that people are jealous of him. Ok, sure hes been acting weird lately but I believe that along with Tom Hanks, Tom Cruise has been one of the most consistantly good performing actors of the past decade.
Post a Comment
<< Home