125 Columbia

Musings of the multi-faced, multi-facultied, and multi-faceted.

Friday, June 15, 2007

Pandering on a Prayer

Great column in the Star today, on the Tory initiative to give parents vouchers to send kids to private religious schools.

    Now, Progressive Conservative Leader John Tory has embarked on the same venture. In an apparent attempt to lure religious minority communities to vote for his party, he is dangling the carrot of funding their private, segregated religious schools.

    Who can blame him? After all, we all live in an era when winning elections is not a means to an end; it has become an end in itself. Securing the votes of religious minorities through their clerics' backing, even if it reverses the progress we have made as a country through public education, seems worth the price.

    If John Tory has his way, this is what a school system of the future will look like in the riding of Don Valley West, where he plans to unseat Education Minister Kathleen Wynne: Imagine an intersection, say Thorncliffe Park Dr. and Overlea Blvd., with a Hindu school on one corner, a Sikh school on another, a Greek Orthodox school on a third corner and, of course, a Shia or Saudi-funded Wahhabi school on the fourth.

    .. A John Tory government, through its proposal to fund and promote faith-based private schools, will create a two-tiered system. Instead of assisting diversity, private religious education will simply nurture narrow-minded segregation, isolating an already marginalized and vulnerable Muslim community to send their children to poorly funded schools.

    The desire on anyone's part to restrict their children's education to their own values should not be supported by public tax dollars. Most Muslim parents wish their children to grow and become educated in a climate of diversity, where they can learn to respect and understand the faiths of others while being exemplary ambassadors of Islam and peace.

Cheers to Tarek Fatah and Salma Siddiqui on this one. They are emphatically right – this is nothing more than a misguided ploy by opportunistic politicians pandering to the ethnic vote, with the potential for disastrous consequences.

I’m a strong proponent of public education. Going to a public school in Toronto exposed me to people of different backgrounds and creeds. I grew comfortable relating to people that didn’t look like me, because I sat-by-side by them and befriended many. Moreover, it taught me that while we may look different and worship different gods, at the core we share a basic humanity. A strong public education system – one that imbues tolerance and respect for others – is IMO all the more important today, at a time when we live side-by-side with people of differing creeds.

If you’re a devout religious parent, then teach religion to your children at home. Send them to Sunday school. Or send them to a religious school, and foot the bill for it. I don’t want my tax dollars funneled to schools that in its essence are divisive and are preaching who-knows-what, especially given the geo-political climate today – do we really want to breed more little jihadis?

Public funding for private religious schooling is emphatically the wrong way to go. If this is in fact part of John Tory’s platform, then I will emphatically refuse to vote for the Tories in the impending Ontario election - I feel very strongly about this. I pray they don’t win.

6 Comments:

- Anonymous Anonymous

-This biased piece totally ignores the current discrimination. Faith based schools for 675,000 Catholic children are already fully funded, and is supported by all three parties. It is obviously unacceptable to discriminate against the other 53,000 going to faith-based schools of other religions, not to mention being a violation of international law according to a binding ruling of the UN Human Rights Committee.

-This piece is fear-mongering about the impact such funding will have. The number of children affected is low, and the experience in other places shows that there is not a large exodus from public schools when funding is extended.

-Allowing faith-based schools to join the broader publicly funded schools system, just as Catholic schools have successfully done for generations, will benefit everyone, as public regulation will be imposed as a condition of funding, which should address any concerns of teaching extremism. These schools are operating anyway – it is just a question whether we treat them fairly and protect the public interest by ensuring they comply with public standards.

The writers are correct that most members of minority groups are quite happy with regular public schools. Faith-based schools are for the minority of the minority who wish their children to be literate in their religion and culture, and able to pass it on to future generations.

-Many faith-based schools actually reflect more social diversity that neighbourhood schools.

-For religious and cultural minorities that are significantly unique, experience has shown that after-school supplementary programs do not work to provide the education necessary for maintaining the religion and culture intact in the next generation.

-While effectively forcing everyone together in the same school may produce a kind of social harmony, it is wrong to purchase social harmony at the cost of the cultural existence of distinctive religious minorities. One can still have social harmony without forcing everyone into the same schools, as shown by Ontario 's long experience with Catholic separate schools.

-The survival of multi-cultural communities is at stake. In the Adler case that went to the Supreme Court of Canada, expert evidence was presented, and accepted by the court, showing that "the Jewish community's survival as an identifiable and practising religious community depends upon broad access for Jewish children to Jewish day schools." Other religious minority communities are similarly affected. As a result, for many affected families, providing a faith-based education for their children is conscientiously seen as a necessity.

6/17/2007 01:09:00 AM
 

- Blogger Lee

I tend to agree with Mikhail's viewpoint on this legislation. Why are Catholic schools receiving a privileged spot over other religions?

Within the constitution there remains an explicit clause defending the funding of Catholic schools, yet preceding that there is the clear clause that there should be no discrimination based on religion. It doesn't make sense.

Anyway, I'm sure that wasn't your point, your point really being that religious schools shouldn't get funding at all in the first place right?

And that is great food for thought. And I'm torn on that.
On one hand, it may serve well to have people be exposed to different viewpoints, but on the other, if there is a significant number in the populace that demands religious schools and those schools need funding to survive, is it democratic to deny them that? Is then the government not responding to the needs of the people?

And I disagree that these schools will turn into hotbeds for jihadists. That is just discimination against Muslims.
If the problem does arise, we will deal with it at that time with the proper measures. But to propose that religious schools will automatically become a place where hatred and extremism is spouted is not abiding by our need to uphold that people and organizations are innocent until prove guilty.

6/19/2007 03:08:00 PM
 

- Anonymous Anonymous

Screw that. We are supposed to be living in a system where laws and policies should not be influenced by religion. In fact, even Catholic schools should not be getting any funding. To say that muslim schools or hindu schools or anglican schools should get funding just because catholic schools get funding is wrong. If these schools want to run, then they should do with their own money. I don't think that it's right that the majority have to pay so that a particular group can "nurture" their religion. However, that being said, I totally am against the idea that just because having these schools, radicalism will increase. Such claims are just purely racist and ignorant.

Also, some will say that if Canada is really a secular nation, then what about Christmas or the Easter holidays? Well I think these are seen as just public holidays and in truth, if you wish to open your stores on these days, you are more than welcome to. In fact, just this past weekend, Nova Scotia lifted it’s ban on shopping stores being open on Sundays.

6/19/2007 04:54:00 PM
 

- Blogger Sen

I don’t mind that only the Catholic school board gets separate funding – AFAIK the reason for this is historical, and had to do with appeasing the French at confederation. But if this contravenes the UN, then I’d rather we abolish funding for religious schooling altogether. I am sure most Canadian religious minorities are with me on this.

I believe exposing kids to diversity is imperative if we want to build a strong, cohesive, multiethnic society. Building friendships with people of diverse backgrounds and creeds lessens prejudice. Public schools foster this in a way religious schools never can.

And my country of origin was torn to shreds by opportunistic politicians who played the race card for votes – this is an ugly precedent and it’s the sort of politics that dear God I don’t want replicated here.

6/20/2007 10:39:00 AM
 

- Blogger Lee

The situation happens to be now that it DOES contravene the UN protocol - they have publicly called Canada out on it.

I am sure that in all likelihood, Catholic schools are going to remain - that no politician will ever try to bring this up.

Thus... isn't it only fair to support other religious schools?
Even though, 100% public schools may be the better answer - given that it may be impossible - what would you do?

6/21/2007 04:08:00 AM
 

- Blogger Tristan

Quick question, how Catholic are Catholic schools anyways? :p

6/21/2007 09:06:00 PM
 

Post a Comment

<< Home